Guantánamo
torturer led brutal Chicago regime of shackling and confession
Longtime
detective’s tactics exported from Chicago to Guantánamo
Minority
Americans allege catalogue of abuse and coercion similar to detainee
Officials
examining complaints after innocent man spent half his life in prison
The results of a Guardian investigation
into Richard Zuley’s detective work, particularly when visited on minority
communities, suggest a continuum between Guantanamo interrogation rooms and
Chicago police precincts
A Chicago detective who led one of the most
shocking acts of torture ever conducted at Guantánamo Bay was responsible for implementing
a disturbingly similar, years-long regime of brutality to elicit murder
confessions from minority Americans.
In
a dark foreshadowing of the United States’ post-9/11 descent into torture, a Guardian
investigation can reveal that Richard Zuley, a detective on Chicago’s north
side from 1977 to 2007, repeatedly engaged in methods of interrogation
resulting in at least one wrongful conviction and subsequent cases more
recently thrown into doubt following allegations of abuse.
Zuley’s
record suggests a continuum between police abuses in urban America and the
wartime detention scandals that continue to do persistent damage to the
reputation of the United States. Zuley’s tactics, which would be supercharged
at Guantánamo when he took over the interrogation of a high-profile detainee as
a US Navy reserve lieutenant, included:
• Shackling suspects to police-precinct walls through
eyebolts for hours on end.
• Accusations of planting evidence when
there was pressure for a high-profile murder conviction.
• Threats of harm to family members of
those under interrogation used as leverage.
• Pressure on suspects to implicate
themselves and others.
• Threats of being subject to the death penalty if
suspects did not confess.
The
Cook County state’s attorney office now has an examination open into a second
conviction involving Zuley, filings in an Illinois court showed on Tuesday. (The Guardian is publishing the first
part of its investigation on Wednesday.) While representatives of the state’s
attorney’s office told the Guardian that the examination concerns only a single
case, the office is seeking civilian complaint files regarding Zuley from a
local independent police review authority.
While ‘assigned’ to the US military base
at Guantánamo Bay, longtime Chicago detective and US Naval reservist Richard
Zuley led one of the most brutal interrogations ever conducted at the prison.
“I’ve never seen anyone stoop to these levels,” a former Marine Corps
prosecutor said.
The
wrongful-conviction examination into Zuley follows an extraordinary 2013
decision by state’s attorney Anita Alvarez to free an innocent man Zuley’s
faulty police work sent to prison for 23 years.
Lathierial
Boyd, convicted in 1990 of murder, accuses Zuley in a federal civil-rights
lawsuit of planting evidence and withholding crucial details.
Boyd
told the Guardian that Zuley had a racial animus as well. “No nigger is
supposed to live like this,” he remembered Zuley telling him after the
detective searched his expensive loft.
Other
Chicago cases detailed by the Guardian, centering on three people interrogated
by Zuley who are still in state prison, turned up evidence in police precinct
houses of severe and internationally condemned tactics in Guantánamo Bay
interrogation rooms.
Several
of those techniques – prolonged shackling, threats about family, pressure to
confess – used by Zuley bear similarities to those he enacted when he took over
the interrogation of Mohamedou Ould Slahi at Guantánamo, described in official
government reports and a best-selling memoir serialised last month by the
Guardian as
one of the most brutal in the history of the notorious US wartime prison.
After Zuley took over in July 2003,
Slahi was subjected to even more extreme interrogation tactics: multiple death
threats, extreme temperatures, sleep deprivation and a terrifying nighttime
boat ride in which he was made to believe that worse was in store.
Most
official accounts of Slahi’s torture have concealed or glossed over Zuley’s
name. After Zuley took over in July 2003, Slahi was subjected to even more
extreme interrogation tactics: multiple death threats, extreme temperatures,
sleep deprivation and a terrifying nighttime boat ride in which he was made to
believe that worse was in store.
A
weeks-long Guardian investigation, unraveled from footnotes in Slahi’s memoir
and involving thousands of police and court documents plus interviews with two
dozen veterans of both Guantánamo Bay and Chicago criminal justice, complicates
that history.
As
Slahi did, inmates said they confessed untruthfully to try and stop the
treatment by Zuley.
“Basically,
they just tortured me, mentally, and somewhat physically, with the cuffs,”
Benita Johnson, an inmate serving a 60-year murder sentence, told the Guardian
from prison of the interrogation that led to her conviction.
Chicago
has long had an institutional problem with police torture. An infamous former
police commander, Jon Burge, used to administer electric shocks to Chicagoans
taken into his station, and hit them over the head with telephone books. On
Friday, Burge was released from home monitoring, the conclusion of a four and a
half year federal sentence – not for torture, but for perjury.
“There
have been a number of really bad apples in the Chicago police department who unquestionably
have railroaded unknown numbers of innocent people into prison,” said Rob
Warden, the founder of Northwestern University’s Center on Wrongful
Convictions. But Warden said he had “never heard of any case in which people
graduated from Chicago to Guantánamo”.
Most
official accounts of Slahi’s torture have concealed or glossed over Zuley’s
name.
Zuley, through a spokesperson, declined to
cooperate with the Guardian’s investigation, despite multiple requests. Neither
his attorney nor the Chicago police department responded to a detailed list of
questions.
Mark Fallon, the former deputy commander of
Guantánamo’s now-shuttered investigative task force for the military
commissions, said Zuley’s interrogation of Slahi “was illegal, it was immoral,
it was ineffective and it was unconstitutional.”
When Zuley took over the Slahi interrogation in
2003 – his name has gone widely unreported – he designed a plan so brutal it
received personal sign-off from then-US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
“The way that he approached interrogations at
Guantánamo,” Fallon said, “if that’s any reflection of what he did in Chicago,
it would not surprise me that he’s got a few issues going on right now.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.